Even Top Chefs End Up at "Maccy D's" — What is the Secret McDonald's Menu That Top British Chefs Secretly Love?

Even Top Chefs End Up at "Maccy D's" — What is the Secret McDonald's Menu That Top British Chefs Secretly Love?

Across the counter of a high-end restaurant, with steaming sauces and perfect cooking. What if the top chefs who make a living in such a "world of gastronomy" suddenly find themselves taking a detour one day—to a McDonald's on the street corner?


The buzz that spread in the UK was, "Even the UK's top chefs eat at McDonald's. And surprisingly, they order 'that order.'" One of the sources was a post from Metro, where even a short phrase completed a "striking composition." People at the pinnacle of the culinary world choosing the most popular menu at the most popular chain. People are drawn to this gap.


The Myth of "Top-tier = Eating Special Things"

We unconsciously tend to think, "Culinary professionals always eat special things." Rare ingredients, hard-to-reserve restaurants, complex techniques. However, the reality of a professional's diet is surprisingly "practical."


Kitchen work drains concentration and stamina. Tasting repeatedly, reading differences in aroma and temperature, making decisions by the second. After such a day, what they seek might be "certainty" rather than "surprise."


The same taste, the same procedure, the same sense of security whenever you go. For a chef, this is a kind of "rest." A meal where they are not the main character—a meal they don't have to think about becomes a reward in itself.


Reactions on Social Media Were Neatly Divided into "Empathy" and "Rejection"

What makes this kind of topic interesting is that it reveals the values of the audience more than the preferences of the chefs themselves. Looking at the reactions on social media, they can be broadly divided into the following types.

 


1) Empathetic Group: "I get it, it's ultimately this"

The most common reaction is empathy: "If even pros eat it, I don't have to be embarrassed for liking it."
For some, McDonald's is more about memories and habits than the "taste itself." After school on the way home, a tired night after work, the comfort of being on a trip. The "commoner order" of a top chef affirms such memories.


2) Realist Group: "If it's a busy job, it's rational"

The next most common view is, "If you're busy, something quick and stable is the right choice."
Chefs' job is to provide meals to others. They can't spend much time on their own meals. So, it's natural to "go for satisfaction in the shortest time," they say.
This perspective steps back from the idea that "the value of cuisine = effort and story" and sees "the value of life = efficiency and recovery."


3) Rejection Group: "Dreams are shattered," "If you're a pro, choose something else..."

On the other hand, there is also rejection: "If you're a top chef, you should be eating something better."
Here lies "aspiration." Chefs often symbolize "ideal taste" and "the sense of choice" for the general public. When junk food enters that, the idol wavers.
However, this rejection is also honest. The desire to "dream" is visible behind the comments.


4) Critic Group: "Is this PR?" "A victory of brand strategy"

A more cool-headed view points out "the design as a topic."

"Chef × McDonald's" is strong as news. It has surprise, can be conveyed in short sentences, and comments are divided and increase. It's a topic suited for social media.


Therefore, even if it seems like a naturally occurring excitement, there is also the view that it is actually "shaped to be easily spread."

Why the "Composition" Is Stronger Than the "Contents of the Order"

In this topic, more than the specific menu names, the intersection of "luxury" and "popular" is the main focus.
What is interesting here is that regardless of the order's content, the audience independently completes the "story."

  • If it's a cheeseburger, it's "returning to basics."

  • If it's a Big Mac, it's "ultimately the classic."

  • If it's nuggets, it's "a snack on the job."

  • If it's fries, it's "the pleasure of salt and oil."


In this way, a single order comes to seem like a "view of life." That's why comments increase. Sometimes social media grows not from the accuracy of information but from the room for interpretation.

The "Origin" of Top Chefs—The Story Is Enriched by Influential Relationships

The story of the culinary world is made up of mentor-mentee relationships and admiration. For example, in the context of Tom Kerridge talking about his origins and influences as a chef, the presence of Marco Pierre White has often been mentioned. The world of chefs is a chain of "legends," and when a person at the end of that chain suddenly sits in a McDonald's, that contrast further increases the magnetic pull of the topic.


The Era When "Popular Chains = Compromise" Is No Longer True

Another aspect not to be overlooked is the change in values.


In the past, eating at a "popular chain" was often seen as "cutting corners or compromising." But now, it is being reevaluated as "occasional indulgence," "comforting taste," or "an option in life."


Especially in busy urban life, "stable and fail-proof food" becomes a significant value. And if this applies even to top-tier chefs, it becomes convincing.


Conclusion: What We Were Looking At Was Not "McDonald's" but "Our Own Values"

In the end, this topic is neither a victory for McDonald's nor a surprise about the chefs.
It was strong because it posed the question, "What does culinary happiness mean to you?" in the form of light conversation.

  • Do we want cuisine to be an "ideal"?

  • Or is cuisine something that supports "life"?

  • How much should luxury and the popular mix?


A small topic about what top chefs order can divide opinions and make people want to talk this much. That's why it grows on social media.
And probably, the next time the same topic comes around, people will comment in the same way again: "I get it," "My dream is shattered," "That's fine."


That very reaction is a cross-section of today's food culture.



Sources