Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

Rising "Decoupling from America" in India: Is the Boycott Real or an Illusion? — The Divisive "Choice of India"

Rising "Decoupling from America" in India: Is the Boycott Real or an Illusion? — The Divisive "Choice of India"

2025年08月12日 11:05

Immediately after U.S. President Trump announced a blanket 50% tariff on imports from India, there was a surge in online calls within India to boycott American brands such as McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon, and Apple. Small gatherings were held on the streets, reviving the old yet new slogan "Stop foreign goods, go local." However, a closer look at the situation reveals that changes in consumer behavior remain limited. This gap between fervor and reality tells the story of current-day India. Reuters


What Happened: The 50% Tariff as a Trigger

The catalyst was the shocking figure of a 50% tariff on Indian imports by the U.S. In response, domestic groups in India, such as the ruling BJP-affiliated Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), called for a boycott of American brands, spreading lists of domestic alternatives via WhatsApp. Images titled "Boycott Foreign Food Chains" also circulated. Meanwhile, news of Tesla opening its second store in Delhi added a symbolic "twist." Prime Minister Modi emphasized "self-reliance" but did not mention specific companies. Reuters


How Widespread Is It?: The Temperature Difference Between Social Media and the Streets

On LinkedIn, a cosmetics startup CEO urged making "Made in India" a global "obsession," advocating learning from China's example. The CEO of ride-hailing service DriveU posted about the need for tech sovereignty, suggesting India create domestic versions of Twitter, Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, and Facebook. ReutersThe Times of IndiaArab News


On the other hand, Reddit discussions highlight the reality that there aren't many "American-made products" to boycott, as many American brands sell Chinese-made goods. Despite the social media buzz, many note that purchasing behavior remains "business as usual." Reddit


Reuters reports from Lucknow, featuring a customer enjoying a 49-rupee coffee at McDonald's, who commented, "Tariffs are a diplomatic issue. Don't drag my McPuff and coffee into it." This glimpse into the rationality of consumers outside the fervor indicates that no immediate sales impact has been observed so far. Reuters


The Structure Supporting the Boycott: Nationalism and "Atmanirbhar"

The driving force is the Modi administration's "Atmanirbhar Bharat" (Self-reliant India) policy. The ruling party-affiliated SJM has been holding small gatherings across the country, distributing "domestic product swap lists" for daily goods. News sites and economic papers have been reporting on this movement, and hashtags like #BoycottUSA and #VocalForLocal are gradually becoming visible on social media. ReutersThe Economic TimesThe Daily Star


The "India Dependency" of American Brands: The Risk of Losing a Major Market

India is one of the most important markets for American platforms and consumer brands. WhatsApp has one of the largest user bases in India, and Domino's Pizza has "more outlets than any other brand" in the country. New stores of Starbucks and Apple still attract long lines. Therefore, the establishment of a boycott could be a severe blow to American companies—though, in the short term, the impact on sales is expected to be limited. Reuters


The Double Whammy of "Tariffs" and "Platforms"

The current tariffs not only raise import prices but also create psychological headwinds for American platforms and retail ecosystems (Amazon, Apple, app, and ad economies). Additionally, the simultaneous occurrence of "diplomatic events" such as the opening of Tesla showrooms attended by government and U.S. embassy officials adds complexity, fueling polarization in public opinion. Reuters


Voices from Social Media: Support, Skepticism, and Cynicism

 


  • Supporters: Posts from SJM supporters and others encouraging participation in the boycott to "teach Trump a lesson." Efforts to make participation "easy" by bundling hashtags are evident. X (formerly Twitter)

  • Skeptics: On Reddit, comments point out that the boycott targets "American brands" rather than "American-made" products, noting the multinational nature of production. Reddit

  • Pragmatists: On LinkedIn, constructive proposals to "bring domestic tech and brands to global standards" are prominent. Reuters


Short- and Medium-term Scenarios

  • Short-term (up to 3 months): Social media-driven enthusiasm. Sales at stores and online are likely to see "no significant decline." However, some categories (soft drinks and fast food) may see campaign suspensions and ad adjustments. Reuters

  • Medium-term (3 to 12 months): A review to increase "local ingredients" and "local supplier ratios" in dining and retail. Platforms will be wary of the rise of alternative services originating from India. The focus for government and municipalities will be on how to pursue both investment attraction and self-reliance.


Implications for Companies

  1. Re-designing messages: Clearly stating "with the community" in advertisements. 2) Localizing supply chains: Offsetting price increases and political risks. 3) Transparency: Explaining how tax and tariff burdens are reflected in prices. 4) Crisis response: Engaging in "dialogue" rather than "confrontation" in response to boycott calls. 5) Community investment: Continuously visualizing support for agriculture, education, and small businesses.


The Reality of Consumers

The simple value perception of "a 49-rupee coffee is a good deal" is strong. Even with rising nationalism, disposable income and "familiar convenience" in daily life do not change easily. Whether the boycott will be a passing phase or truly change behavior depends on how companies engage and how the government provides support and regulation. Reuters


Reference Articles

Trump Tariffs Spark India Backlash, Boycott Calls for U.S. Brands
Source: https://seekingalpha.com/news/4483018-trump-tariffs-spark-india-backlash-boycott-calls-for-us-brands?utm_source=feed_news_all&utm_medium=referral&feed_item_type=news

Powered by Froala Editor

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.