Is Tinder Ending the "Swipe Hell" with AI? The New Feature "Chemistry" Aims to Tackle the "Too Many Choices Problem"

Is Tinder Ending the "Swipe Hell" with AI? The New Feature "Chemistry" Aims to Tackle the "Too Many Choices Problem"

"Swipe again today, and nothing happens in the end."


Anyone who has used a dating app is likely familiar with this sense of futility. You browse through dozens or even hundreds of profiles, finally match with someone, but the conversation doesn't continue. Even if you manage to set a date, it fizzles out naturally. Eventually, opening the app itself becomes a "task," leading to exhaustion and logout—commonly known as "swipe fatigue" or "dating app burnout."


Tinder is attempting to reduce this "fatigue" with AI. The new feature "Chemistry" aims to shift from the traditional "handling a large number of cards" design to a model that offers "a few good suggestions" based on user understanding. The mechanism involves two main components: learning about values and preferences through answers to questions, and estimating areas of interest and "authenticity" by referencing the smartphone's camera roll, but only with the user's permission.


A policy shift away from the "infinite choice" experience

Tinder has long been synonymous with swipe culture. It's intuitive, addictive, and the hope that "the next one might be the right one" keeps your finger moving. However, the "infinite choices" are, in reality, quite illusory. A match only happens if the other person chooses you too, and even then, there's no guarantee of compatibility or timing. Yet, the UI alone gives the impression of "endless candidates." As a result, despite the ability to choose, decisions aren't made, and the endless browsing continues—this contradiction amplifies fatigue.


Chemistry aims to alleviate this contradiction. According to the management, instead of mass swiping, users will be presented with candidates "one drop, two drops" through interactions like answering questions. In other words, the focus shifts from "increasing numbers to hit the target" to "reducing attempts to improve accuracy." It's a shift from a "search game" to "recommendation" in matchmaking.


The reality of declining registrations, usage, and subscriptions

The background to this shift is not idealism but a sense of urgency regarding performance. In the dating app market, including Tinder, user fatigue, distrust of malicious users, and a slowdown in new entries are common issues. Tinder acknowledges the decline in registered users and monthly active users but sees signs of improvement. However, placing AI at the center of improvement measures indicates a judgment that "there's a limit to the traditional approach."


Moreover, Tinder's theme for this year highlights "relevance," "authenticity," and "trust" as Gen Z's dissatisfaction. In other words, the symbol of "light and fast encounters" is changing to "shallow," "suspicious," and "exhausting" for the younger generation. Thus, the broad aim is to shift the discovery experience from "repetitive tasks" to proposals tailored to the individual's context.


AI is not the only trump card for regaining trust

Interestingly, Tinder is emphasizing "safety measures" alongside "improving matching accuracy with AI." For example, a verification feature using facial recognition (Face Check) is mentioned as a mechanism to strengthen identity verification, reducing contact with malicious users. This means that the cause of burnout is not only "too many candidates" but also includes "not being able to use it safely" and "a high probability of encountering strange individuals."


In reality, the root of fatigue is not just "quantity."
- No response even after matching
- Conversations feel templated
- Mixed with spammers and bots
- Receiving abusive or unpleasant messages

When such stress accumulates, it leads to "not wanting to open it anymore." Tinder has previously used AI as a "coach," such as prompting users with "Are you sure you want to send this?" before sending aggressive messages. AI is delving into designing "less volatile communication," not just matching.


However, the reaction on social media begins with "skepticism" rather than "expectation."

So, are users welcoming this AI shift? Observing reactions on social media and communities, the atmosphere is quite complex.


What stands out first is the sarcastic sneer. On Reddit threads, comments like "Isn't Tinder mostly bots now?" appear at the top from the beginning. Additionally, jokes like "AI will find the 'charming local bot' for you" are made. This reflects a psychology of doubting the "environment's security" before product improvement. The sentiment is "ensure the other party is human before making smart recommendations."


Next, there's strong dissatisfaction with subscription pressure and pricing. The view that "it's ultimately an excuse for expensive subscriptions" is prevalent, with posts mocking the annual subscription fee and exchanges like "Isn't it free?" "No, it's not free" being common. In other words, dissatisfaction with the experience is tied not just to individual features but also to distrust in the "business model."


And the biggest issue is privacy. Although Chemistry requires consent, the mere mention of accessing the camera roll makes many wary. Even if explained as "estimating hobbies from photos," users are left with concerns like "how much is being seen," "is it used for learning," and "won't it leak externally?" On social media, there's repeated intuitive resistance like "fatigue might decrease, but is it worth offering 'fragments of one's life' in return?"


On the other hand, there are positive voices. On LinkedIn, perspectives like "fatigue is not a failure but a sign that users want 'something more genuine'" are shared, and the direction of reducing "unnecessary choices" with AI is seen as meaningful. In essence, it's not AI creating the problem, but the existing "engagement-focused" design that's problematic, and AI could be a tool to correct it.


Marketing investment to make "Tinder cool again"—AI is both a "function" and a "story"

Moreover, it's intriguing that Tinder is trying to change not just the product but the "atmosphere." A large-scale marketing investment is being made, with a strategy to create the narrative that "Tinder is cool again" through creator initiatives. At this point, Chemistry is not just a new feature but a symbol of brand revival. To give tired users a "reason to return," not only functional improvements but also a social context that makes using it not "uncool" is necessary—this calculation is evident.


Can AI really cure "burnout"?

In conclusion, Chemistry seems to be quite a promising prescription for the symptom of "swipe fatigue." By narrowing down candidate suggestions, incorporating context through questions, and reducing the probability of mismatches, it represents a natural evolution from search to recommendation.


However, the roots of burnout run deep.
- Whether the other party is genuine (bot and scammer issues)
- Rude messages and harassment
- Structures where progress doesn't occur even after matching
- Suspicions that the experience is distorted by monetization
- And the "intrusive consent" of the camera roll
Unless these are resolved simultaneously, "AI has become smarter, but it's still exhausting" could occur.


Therefore, this move is closer to a "redesign of the swipe culture Tinder itself created" rather than merely "AI implementation." Instead of showing infinite choices and causing fatigue, it aims to move forward with a few elite suggestions. If this can be achieved, the next norm in dating apps might shift from "swipe" to "recommendation."


However, whether users will go along with this future depends more on "trust" and "consent design that can be agreed upon" than on AI accuracy.


Source URL

Related Articles