Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

New York City Sues Social Media Companies Over Child Dependency: Can Algorithms Protect Minors? — NYC Challenges Social Media as a "Public Nuisance"

New York City Sues Social Media Companies Over Child Dependency: Can Algorithms Protect Minors? — NYC Challenges Social Media as a "Public Nuisance"

2025年10月10日 00:27
On October 8, 2025, New York City filed a 327-page complaint in federal court against major platforms such as Meta (Facebook/Instagram), Alphabet (Google/YouTube), Snap (Snapchat), and ByteDance (TikTok), accusing them of "addicting children and exacerbating the mental health crisis among youth." The main claims are "gross negligence" and "public nuisance," seeking damages including public education and healthcare costs. On the same day, the city announced its intention to withdraw from a state court lawsuit and join a nationwide federal lawsuit (MDL) proceeding in the Northern District of California.

Investing.com.


The complaint points out that each service is designed to exploit "the psychology and neurophysiology of young people," reinforcing usage and disrupting life rhythms, such as increased sleep deprivation and tardiness or absenteeism. It cites statistics showing that 77.3% of New York City high school students (82.1% of females) self-report more than three hours of screen time per day, arguing that addictive use systematically negatively impacts learning and health. Investing.com.


Furthermore, the complaint links the recent increase in "surfing" (dangerous acts of riding on top or sides of subway cars) in the New York subway to a chain of "stimulating content being spread," citing police data that at least 16 people have died since 2023, including two girls aged 12 and 13 this month alone. The city emphasizes that "public education and healthcare are bearing the brunt of the damage, with taxpayers footing the bill." Investing.com.


In initial reactions from the defendants, a Google spokesperson countered, "YouTube is not a social network for sharing updates with friends, but a streaming service." Other companies have refrained from detailed comments at this time. Investing.com.


Background: NYC's Policy and New NY State Legislation

In January 2024, New York City became the first major U.S. city to officially designate social media as a "public health hazard," intensifying social awareness of the risks. The Washington Post.


In June of the same year, New York State enacted the "SAFE for Kids Act (Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation)," which principally prohibits "highly addictive algorithmic feeds" for minors and sets restrictions on notifications from midnight to 6 a.m. The draft implementation rules were announced by the state attorney general in September 2025, detailing age verification and parental consent acquisition methods. Hunton Andrews Kurth.


In essence, the current NYC lawsuit is an extension of a movement climbing the steps of the city's health crisis declaration→state institutionalization→joining a large-scale federal lawsuit. The simultaneous progression of legal battles and regulatory development is likely to pressure platforms to make multiple adjustments, such as design changes, age estimation, and consent process enhancements.


Legal Issues: Is Platform Design "Product Liability" or "Speech"?

In platform lawsuits for minors, not limited to this case, the relationship with (1) Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (platform immunity) and (2) the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (freedom of speech) often becomes a point of contention. Companies tend to emphasize the issue of "user-generated content" and argue that the freedom of design (ranking and recommendations) should be broadly protected. On the other hand, plaintiffs tend to position the design itself as "defective" or "dangerous," holding the behavioral intervention mechanisms like UI/UX, reward design, and notification frequency accountable. In New York, there are also cases where individual lawsuits over subway surfing fatalities are proceeding with the premise of the platform's "active involvement." Reuters.


Impact on Market and Society

In the short term, there may be restrictions on ad inventory and the age-specific behavior of recommendation algorithms, potentially reducing teen engagement time and contact frequency. Particularly, the nighttime halt of notifications and the default off of recommendation feeds touch the core of engagement design. Meanwhile, platforms are likely to refine age estimation (device signals, behavior patterns) and parental consent acquisition UX, aiming to minimize profit impact by creating a **"separate UX for minors."**


In educational settings, restrictions on bringing smartphones and strengthening in-school usage rules continue. In communities of parents and educators, there is a balance between those advocating "parental responsibility" and those emphasizing "corporate design responsibility," sometimes leading to heated debates. Hacker News.



SNS Reactions (Key Points)

  • Emphasis on "Parental Role"
    There is a strong view that "children's online exposure is a parenting issue, and it's misplaced to blame only the platforms." Hacker News.

  • Focus on "Design Responsibility"
    There are voices saying, "The design of 'recommendations' and notifications captures the attention of young people and disrupts sleep. Companies should change their designs." Reddit.

  • Sharing of On-the-Ground Experiences
    Posts have pointed out specific changes, such as "lunch breaks have become livelier" at schools where smartphones are banned. Hacker News.

While individual posts are diverse and inconsistent, there is a noticeable shift in the debate from "whether to ban" to "how to implement" following the presentation of NY State law's implementation rules. New York State Attorney General.



What to Expect Next

  1. The Main Battlefield in Court is "Design"
    How the specific design of algorithms, notifications, and UI is linked to "danger" or "negligence" will be examined. By joining the MDL, the scope of evidence disclosure (documents, experimental data, A/B results) may expand. Reuters.

  2. Testing the Implementation of Regulations
    The SAFE Act in NY State directly ties the details of implementation, such as age verification, parental consent, and nighttime notification handling, to competitiveness. The tech side will gradually introduce "chronological feeds" as defaults and notification moderation, while the key will be how to create a frictionless UX for proving non-minor status. . AP News.

  3. Collaboration Among Parents, Schools, and Municipalities
    Ultimately, collaboration among families, schools, and public health is necessary. Since the city's health crisis declaration in 2024, it has expanded information provision and literacy education systems, and the lawsuit functions as a cost recovery and behavior change pressure in that continuum. New York City Government.



Practical Notes (For Brand/Education Stakeholders)

  • Review the "Defaults" of Minor UX: Default off recommendations, nighttime notification suppression, adjustment of scroll-inducing UI.

  • Visualize Accountability: Transparency in warning dialogs and "why this post is shown."

  • Age Estimation and Parental Consent: Consent acquisition should be "two-step" (from the individual→parent), ensuring auditability including record management.

  • Collaboration with Schools: Align policies on device usage and in-class device use rules with families.


Reference Articles

New York City Sues Social Media Companies for Allegedly Addicting Children
Source: https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/new-york-city-sues-social-media-companies-for-allegedly-addicting-children-4278067

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.