Why Don't Doctors Recommend Low-Carb Diets? Organizing the Diet Debate Through "Food Quality"

Why Don't Doctors Recommend Low-Carb Diets? Organizing the Diet Debate Through "Food Quality"

"I lost weight with low carbs" and "My blood sugar stabilized." While such testimonials flood social media, there is a growing trend of doctors and nutrition experts becoming wary of the term "low-carb diet." What exactly is not aligning? To cut to the chase, the issue is not about "whether to reduce carbohydrates" but rather what to cut, what to replace it with, and how long to continue .


Low-carb can "work" sometimes. That's why it has spread

The appeal of low-carb is straightforward. By reducing staples and sweets and increasing proteins and fats like meat, fish, eggs, and dairy products, some people find their appetite calms down, making it easier to lose weight in a short period. Additionally, accumulated research shows that under certain conditions, it can be effective in controlling blood sugar in type 2 diabetes.


However, the important point here is that "low-carb ≠ always the optimal solution." The easier it is to achieve short-term results, the more likely people are to mistakenly believe the method is "universal." This sense of universality triggers the caution switch on the doctor's side.


What doctors dislike is not "carbohydrates themselves," but the "structure" that low-carb tends to create

Experts repeatedly express concern not about low-carb itself, but about three common issues that tend to arise as a result of its practice.


1) The problem of "leaning towards saturated fats" as a replacement
When reducing carbohydrates, what do you fill the calorie gap with? If you lean towards red meat, processed meat, butter, or fatty foods, the intake of saturated fats tends to increase. Even if weight loss is successful, in the long run, it may invite other issues such as cardiovascular risks.


2) The problem of dragging down even good-quality carbohydrates
On social media, short statements like "carbs are bad" and "carbohydrates make you fat" spread easily. However, carbohydrates do not only refer to white sugar or white bread. Beans, fruits, whole grains, and tubers are packed with dietary fiber and micronutrients. If these are also vilified, the overall nutritional density of the diet tends to drop.


3) The problem of difficulty in continuation and the tendency for rebound
Strict restrictions are prone to collapse during dining out, social gatherings, or family meals. If not sustained, rebound or "binge eating" is likely to occur, resulting in repeated weight fluctuations. What doctors are wary of is precisely this loop of "short-term success → universal view → excessive restriction → rebound."

From "quantity of carbohydrates" to "quality of carbohydrates": Shifting the focus of the discussion

The biggest reason the low-carb debate becomes complicated is that the single word "carbohydrates" encompasses both refined and natural foods. Sweet soft drinks, pastries, and snacks made from refined wheat tend to spike blood sugar levels and are easy to overconsume. On the other hand, fruits, beans, whole grains, and root vegetables often come with dietary fiber and nutrients.


In other words, instead of the crude banner of "reduce carbohydrates," reducing refined carbohydrates while retaining those rich in dietary fiber is a more realistic approach.


What comes in handy here is the "method of discernment." When choosing processed foods, don't just rely on the "whole" label; check if whole grains are among the top ingredients and how much sugar is included. Additionally, using the balance of carbohydrates and dietary fiber (e.g., at least 1g of dietary fiber per 10g of carbohydrates) as a guideline helps enhance quality while suppressing excessive fear of carbohydrates.


Reactions on social media: Opinions are influenced by "experience" and "ideology"

This topic tends to ignite on social media because the testimonials are so intense. In reality, reactions tend to fall into three main categories.

 


A) "Conspiracy theory-like" backlash: Doctors = vested interests, a narrative
On overseas forums, sarcastic remarks or assumptions like "Big Carb is controlling doctors" are prominent. While short statements have the power to spread, they can overshadow individual medical circumstances and the premises of research.


B) "Not that difficult" group: Ultimately, avoid processed foods, a return to common sense
On the other hand, there are reactions that dislike extreme claims, such as "Just avoid sweets, alcohol, wheat, and processed foods, and move moderately. It's not that complicated." This attitude aims to bring dietary discussions, which can become "religious wars," back to the basics of lifestyle habits.


C) "Experience is everything" group: Saved by low-carb, so criticism is unacceptable
Those who have had successful experiences with weight loss or blood sugar improvement tend to have a strong conviction that "it worked for me, so it's right." There is a sense of urgency here. However, medically, the leap from "it worked for some" to "it's optimal for everyone" is dangerous. The "exceptions" or "conditional" statements by experts often lose out to the fervor of testimonials.


Observing the discussions on social media, the real conflict appears to be not "medicine vs. individual" but rather a clash between **short-term success stories vs. long-term reproducibility (whether it can be sustained / whether nutrition is balanced)**.


So what should we do? If you're going to do "low-carb," change the design

The realistic compromise is neither "stop low-carb" nor "low-carb is justice."

  • First, cut refined carbohydrates : sugary drinks, sweets, snacks made from refined wheat, etc.

  • Choose which carbohydrates to keep : fruits, beans, whole grains, vegetables, and tubers (adjust quantity according to condition and purpose)

  • Improve the quality of fats : Don't lean towards red meat and processed meat; also use fish, olive oil, nuts, seeds, etc.

  • Consider setting a time limit : After losing weight in the short term, transition to "maintenance" by reintroducing quality carbohydrates

  • Don't go solo for medical purposes : If undergoing diabetes treatment or taking medication, extreme self-imposed restrictions can increase risks like hypoglycemia, so coordinate with healthcare providers


Ultimately, the reason doctors dislike the "low-carb" banner is that it's too broad, encompassing a wide range of practices from strict carbohydrate restriction to merely reducing sugar. This is why discussions don't align.


In other words, what we should focus on is not "hating carbohydrates," but designing the quality of carbohydrates and the overall nutritional balance according to one's goals (weight loss, blood sugar, health) . Those who can distill it into a sustainable form, without being swept up in social media frenzy, are more likely to succeed in the long term.


Source URL

Related Articles