Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

Japan Faces Backlash Over "Single Tax": A Scenario Where Measures to Combat Declining Birthrate Backfire

Japan Faces Backlash Over "Single Tax": A Scenario Where Measures to Combat Declining Birthrate Backfire

2025年06月24日 09:50

※This article is primarily intended for overseas investors, policy researchers, and Japanese expatriates, providing an overview of structural issues and institutional design risks in Japanese society.


1. What is the "Single Tax" Controversy?

In April 2026, the Kishida administration will introduce the "Child and Childcare Support Fund" as a new pillar of measures against declining birthrates. The plan is to add several hundred to a thousand yen to medical insurance premiums per month, securing 1 trillion yen annually by fiscal 2028. However, on social media, it has been criticized as a "Single Tax" that imposes a burden even on those without children, leading to a firestorm of related posts exceeding millions of impressions.finance.yahoo.co.jp


2. Discrepancy Between Government Explanation and Public Opinion

Junko Mihara, Minister in charge of the Children and Family Agency, argues that "the benefits of the support fund extend to all generations," but support is not widespread. Many voices suggest that "if the Children and Family Agency is abolished, funds can be generated," further fueling the fire of government messaging.finance.yahoo.co.jp


3. Real Reactions Gathered from Social Media

  • "When I opened my payslip, I found a stealthy deduction... essentially a stealth tax increase" (Female in her 20s)

  • "In an economic situation where even marriage is tough, are they going to take more money?" (Male in his 30s)

  • "No consideration for those who want children but can't have them" (Female in her 40s, experienced infertility treatment)

  • "If it's a measure against declining birthrates, raise wages. Leading with burdens is counterproductive" (IT Engineer)note.com

Even on conservative YouTube programs, questions like "Are they really going to impose a Single Tax?" were raised, and the video surpassed 300,000 views within a week of release.


4. The Vicious Cycle of Economic Stagnation and Declining Birthrates

Economist Takumi Fujinami believes that low growth since the 1990s has pushed down real wages for the younger generation, increasing the cost of marriage and childbirth. Ryutaro Kono criticizes that "even if productivity rises, it is not returned to wages, and companies hoard internal reserves, creating an 'exploitative society.'"finance.yahoo.co.jp


According to Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare statistics, the number of births in 2024 will fall below 700,000 for the first time, and the total fertility rate will drop to 1.15. Experts unanimously state that "without wage increases and employment stability, there will be no reversal in the birthrate."


5. Comparison with Overseas Measures

  • France: Maintains a birthrate in the 1.80s by funding child allowances, housing allowances, and free education through income-linked taxes.

  • South Korea: Focuses on cash benefits, but without correcting wage disparities, the birthrate has fallen to the 0.7 range.

  • Singapore: Achieves population maintenance through housing benefits and the introduction of immigrants rather than tax deductions.

Japan's new system is small in scale, funded by public burden, while wage increases and immigration discussions are shelved, resembling the "South Korean model." As a result, the sense of burden is highlighted.


6. Four Risks of Institutional Design

  1. Erosion of Marriage Incentives
    Even a few hundred yen a month is heavy for "young people on the poverty line." If the number of marriages decreases further, the number of births will also decrease.

  2. Deepening Intergenerational Inequality
    The elderly who have completed childbirth and child-rearing also bear the burden, but the structure of receiving more benefits than they pay in pensions and medical expenses remains unchanged, amplifying dissatisfaction among the younger generation.

  3. Acceleration of Social Division
    The "parents vs. singles" conflict on social media can easily link to gender conflicts and urban-rural disparities.

  4. Cooling of Investment Mindset
    If additional burdens are imposed in an environment where real wages continue to fall, disposable income will shrink further, distancing the growth scenario led by domestic demand. Overseas investors may view this as a "lack of policy consistency," leading to a reluctance to invest in yen assets.


7. Perspectives of Foreign Media and Investors

Internationally, the sensational term "Single Tax" has garnered interest, with Reuters and FT-related research memos pointing out signs of "fiscal populism." Especially ESG investors have begun to closely monitor the institutional impact from the perspective of "social inclusion."


8. Alternatives and Recommendations

  • Legislation for Wage Increases: Gradual increase of over 3% annually in minimum wage and thorough implementation of equal pay for equal work.

  • Redesign of Income-Linked Social Insurance Premiums: Introduce progressive exemptions for the younger generation, adjusting burdens based on income capacity rather than the presence of children.

  • A Third Supporter: Expand acceptance and settlement promotion of highly skilled foreign talent to supplement the labor force population.

  • Governance Reform: Change the KPI of the Children and Family Agency from "number of births" to "real disposable income of young households" to visualize policy effects.


9. Conclusion: The Essence of Measures Against Declining Birthrates is "Wages That Allow for Peace of Mind"

As European examples show, childcare measures are effective only when "economic security" is a prerequisite. A system that leads with burdens and lacks explanation may instead lower the birthrate and undermine the sustainability of Japanese society. The "Single Tax" controversy has made visible the consequences of separating economic policy from social policy.


Japan cannot tax its way out of a demographic cliff; it must grow its way out.
― Economic Historian Andrew Gordon (Harvard University)


For the new system to achieve its original purpose, it is essential to redesign it into a comprehensive package accompanied by wage increases and a growth strategy.


← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.