Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

San Rafael's Bold Move: E-cigarette Ban in Public Housing Sparks Mixed Reactions from Residents - Balconies Off-Limits, E-cigarettes Included

San Rafael's Bold Move: E-cigarette Ban in Public Housing Sparks Mixed Reactions from Residents - Balconies Off-Limits, E-cigarettes Included

2025年11月06日 11:00

On November 3, 2025, the San Rafael City Council in California passed the first reading of an amendment to enforce a smoking ban in multi-unit housing (duplexes/multi-family housing), explicitly prohibiting the use of electronic cigarettes (vapes), which had been an exception. The final vote is expected on November 17, and if passed, the city will once again lead national discussions. San Rafael



What Will Change

As of 2012, San Rafael had a strong ordinance widely prohibiting smoking indoors and on balconies in multi-unit housing. However, in recent years, a loophole allowing "OK for e-cigarettes" remained, leading to disputes over vapor (aerosol) intrusion from adjacent rooms or balconies. The current amendment removes this exception for e-cigarettes, banning "all smoking (cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, etc.)" in the applicable areas inside and outside multi-unit housing. CBS News


The amendment also adds provisions allowing injunctions in small claims court to enhance enforcement effectiveness in case of violations. This aims to ensure the functionality of the civil enforcement measures (private right of action) introduced for residents in 2024. Google Cloud Storage library.municode.com



Timeline: Until This Decision

  • 2012: Principally banned smoking indoors, in common areas, and on balconies in multi-unit housing. Reported as a pioneering example nationwide. CBS News

  • September 2024: Amended the ordinance to allow residents to seek civil remedies to deter violations (Ordinance 2042). library.municode.com

  • November 3, 2025: First reading of the amendment to eliminate the e-cigarette exception and clarify the "ban on all smoking in multi-unit housing." The final vote is scheduled for November 17. San Rafael


Tailwind: County and Nearby Movements and National Trends

In the same Marin County, there has been an accelerated movement to tighten regulations on the retail of tobacco products and ban the sale of e-cigarettes, focusing on the supply side. The nearby town of Tiburon is expected to become the first in Northern California to entirely ban the sale of nicotine and tobacco products. Strengthening regulations within San Rafael's housing will elevate regional measures with these "retail" and "use" dual approaches. Local News Matters marincounty.gov


Nationally, the trend of smoke-free multi-unit housing is expanding, with over 100 municipalities having implemented regulations including private residences in some form as of July 2025. no-smoke.org



Discussion Points: Private Space vs. Public Health

Proponents' Points

  • Residents should be protected from secondary and tertiary exposure (residues remaining on walls, carpets, etc.). Especially in multi-unit housing, "smoke and vapor leakage" is structurally difficult to avoid.

  • It also helps reduce fire risks and property damage.

  • Even e-cigarettes are not completely harmless, and exceptions have been a source of conflict. Google Cloud Storage


Cautious Points

  • To what extent can the government regulate actions in private spaces, and is it overreaching?

  • Enforcement based on complaints may exacerbate conflicts among residents.

  • There are also voices suggesting that alternative measures such as ventilation and odor control should be prioritized. In other cities that have introduced similar ordinances, there have been reports of criticism as **"government overreach."** The Times


SNS Reactions (Summary)

On X and local bulletin boards, the following pros and cons are prominent (a summary of general reactions with proper names omitted).

  • "Finally, the loophole for e-cigarettes is closing. Good news for families with children."

  • "Even balcony smoking lets the smell in, so this helps."

  • "It's overreach to dictate even inside the house."

  • "Reports and lawsuits will increase, making neighborhood relations tense. Architectural measures should come first."

  • "While some municipalities are moving to ban sales, only tightening 'places to smoke' is unbalanced."
    *The above is a summary based on typical points observed in previous reports and discussions in neighboring municipalities regarding similar systems. The latest county discussions on the pros and cons of sales regulations also reflect a division of opinion. Local News Matters


Enforcement and Impact on Daily Life: What Will Happen?

  1. Review of Property Management
    Management companies and owners need to organize tenant agreements, postings, and violation procedures (warning→record→claim/injunction request). With the possibility of injunctions in small claims court, the deterrent effect on violations is expected to increase. Google Cloud Storage

  2. Behavioral Changes for Residents
    Regardless of cigarettes, cigars, or e-cigarettes, use is generally prohibited in indoor areas, balconies, private gardens, etc. It is advisable to check in advance about smoking cessation clinics and alternative nicotine products for nicotine dependence, as well as the availability of designated smoking areas. Google Cloud Storage

  3. Preventing Troubles
    Complaints can easily become emotional. It is advisable to keep records of dates, places, and situations, and first seek correction through the management company. Additionally, considering measures against secondary and tertiary exposure (sealing, airtightness improvement, air purifiers) is also worthwhile.



Implications for the Region: Why Now?

In Marin County, a survey reported that about 17% of 11th graders use vapes, raising strong concerns about nicotine dependence among the youth. In addition to external measures such as sales and pricing, aligning "protection from within" by reducing exposure risks in residential spaces—this ordinance amendment can be seen as the final piece of that puzzle. San Francisco Chronicle



Future Schedule

  • November 17 (Monday), 2025: Final reading and vote are expected. If passed, the amendment is expected to be formally enacted as stated in the ordinance text. Google Cloud Storage


Summary

Following 2012, San Rafael once again in 2025 sends a strong message of **"protecting living spaces from a public health perspective."** Balancing the freedom of private spaces, the reality of enforcement, and consideration for neighborhood relations—challenges remain, but the elimination of the e-cigarette exception marks a milestone in the long-term trend towards smoke-free housing. Attention should be paid to the final decision of the council and the careful implementation on the ground. no-smoke.org


Reference Articles

San Rafael Advances Vaping Ban for Housing Complexes
Source: https://www.marinij.com/2025/11/04/san-rafael-advances-vaping-ban-for-housing-complexes/

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.