Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

The "Invisible Pollution" Plastic Packaging Brings to the Table: The Reality and Countermeasures of Micro and Nanoplastics Entering Food Through Everyday Use

The "Invisible Pollution" Plastic Packaging Brings to the Table: The Reality and Countermeasures of Micro and Nanoplastics Entering Food Through Everyday Use

2025年06月24日 20:00

Contents

  1. Introduction: Plastics as "Silent Dining Table Pollution"

  2. Background and Purpose of the Study

  3. Methodology of Systematic Evidence Map

  4. Main Identified Pollution Pathways

  5. Case Study: Cutting Boards, Wraps, and Bottle Caps

  6. Are Alternative Materials Safe? The Unexpected Pitfalls of Glass Bottles

  7. Latest Findings on Health Impacts: Intestinal Inflammation, Endocrine Disruption, and Placental Transfer

  8. Regulatory Trends and International Comparisons

  9. Gaps in Japan's Food Packaging System

  10. Actions for Companies and Consumers

  11. Conclusion: Shedding Light on "Invisible Pollution"




1. Introduction: Plastics as "Silent Dining Table Pollution"

The threat of plastic waste to marine ecosystems is now widely recognized. However, the same issue is occurring on our plates. Food packaging and cooking utensils, long considered "safe," have been releasing unexpected fine particles into food—this reality was substantiated by a large-scale review published on June 24, 2025.phys.org



2. Background and Purpose of the Study

Research on the migration of micro- and nanoplastics (MNP) in food contact articles (FCA) is rapidly increasing. However, the lack of standardized test conditions, detection methods, and reporting units has hindered the creation of an overview useful for policy-making.

Researchers from the Swiss NPO "Food Packaging Forum" comprehensively evaluated 103 peer-reviewed papers published over the past 15 years to construct the world's first systematic evidence map. This aims to facilitate consumer risk assessment and regulatory design.world's first systematic evidence mapphys.org



3. Methodology of Systematic Evidence Map

  • Scope of Collection: 7 databases including PubMed and Web of Science

  • Target Particles: Size less than 10 mm (ISO definition). Detection limit from 1 nm

  • Medium: 54% real food, 46% food simulant

  • FCA Classification: Bottles, bags, films, cooking utensils, 3D printed resins, etc.

  • Quality Assessment: Bias evaluated in five stages through blind double review


These are published as FCMiNo (Food Contact Micro- and Nanoplastics), allowing anyone to filter and download for free. The transparency of the research and ease of secondary analysis are groundbreaking.



4. Main Identified Pollution Pathways

  1. Abrasion from Opening and Cutting

    • Simply opening a pack of ham detected an average of 3.5 × 10³ particles/g of MNP.

  2. Heating (Boiling, Microwave)

    • Heating a polypropylene container at 100℃ for 10 minutes increased PP-derived particles by 27%.

  3. Scraping (Cutting Board)

    • Continuously cutting fish on a PE cutting board for 10 minutes reached 10⁴ particles/meal.

  4. Chemical Nature of Contents

    • Foods high in fats and oils tend to have increased MNP migration.



5. Case Study: Cutting Boards, Wraps, and Bottle Caps

Investigations assuming impacts in real-life settings rather than laboratories are also progressing. Particularly, the opening and closing of PET bottle caps and the cut edges of PVC wraps showed significant particle release.




6. Are Alternative Materials Safe? The Unexpected Pitfalls of Glass Bottles

Coinciding with the Swiss study, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) reported that **"the microplastic content in glass bottle beverages is 5 to 50 times that of plastic bottles."** The cause is said to be the paint on the outer surface of the cap rubbing off. In Japan, where more companies are switching to glass for environmental reasons, the lack of cap specification review could lead to new risks despite the "plastic-free" initiative.phys.org



7. Latest Findings on Health Impacts: Intestinal Inflammation, Endocrine Disruption, and Placental Transfer

  • Gastrointestinal Barrier: 0.1 µm-class nanoparticles penetrate the intestinal epithelium and induce inflammation.

  • Endocrine Disruption: Cases have been reported where polyethylene particles are absorbed and fat-soluble phthalates are released simultaneously.

  • Placental Transfer: MNP was detected in 4 out of 11 placentas in a maternity hospital in Sicily, Italy.

While a causal relationship cannot yet be determined in human epidemiology,animal experiments have repeatedly confirmed liver steatosis, testicular function decline, and neuroinflammation.



8. Regulatory Trends and International Comparisons

RegionCurrent RegulationsFuture Developments
EUStrengthened nanoparticle definition under REACH. Mandatory notification of MNP-containing products from 2026Discussing a complete ban by 2030
USAFDA has a pre-notification system for food contact materials (FCM). However, particle migration testing is voluntaryMandatory under the proposed "Food Packaging Safety Act" revision in 2025
JapanNo particle regulations in the positive list system of the Food Sanitation ActMinistry of Health, Labour and Welfare plans to publish guidelines in 2026





9. Gaps in Japan's Food Packaging System

  • Reliance on Voluntary Standards: Industry association guidelines are central, with weak enforcement

  • Lack of Inspection Systems: Less than 30% of municipal inspection labs can quantify particles using GC/MS or FTIR

  • Delay in Information Disclosure: No public platform equivalent to the EU's "SCIP database"



10. Actions for Companies and Consumers

Companies

  1. Reduce paint and review coatings on caps and films

  2. Adopt non-plastic materials (such as paper laminates) instead of recycled PET

  3. Introduce standard testing methods like ISO 21720 and disclose results


Consumers

  • Whenever possible, usebulk sales and reusable bottles

  • Avoid high-temperature cooking even with PP and PE containers

  • Regularly polish and replace wooden or glass cutting boards

  • Choose products labeled "MNP migration tested" when replacing



11. Conclusion: Shedding Light on "Invisible Pollution"

While the environmental impact of plastics is widely discussed in Japan, the pressing aspect of "possibly ingesting them daily at our dining tables" is not yet fully visualized. The open database from this study serves as a powerful tool to numerically grasp "invisible pollution." Considering the complex risk landscape, including alternative materials, it is the responsibility of policy, industry, and consumers to take unified action for the next generation.policy, industry, and consumers to take unified action



List of Reference Articles


A new evidence map shows that the use of conventional plastic packaging contaminates food with microplastics and nanoplastics.
Source: https://phys.org/news/2025-06-evidence-plastic-packaging-contaminates-food.html

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.