Signs of a Black Hole Explosion: Exploring the Potential to Change the History of the Universe - Will Cosmic Fireworks Really Happen? The Bold Hypothesis Indicated by "90%" and the Reality on the Ground

"There's Over a 90% Chance We Can Observe an 'Exploding' Black Hole in the Next Decade"—an unbelievable headline that swept across various media outlets on September 11 (Japan time). The source is a new paper by a research team from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and the subject is not the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies, but rather "primordial black holes (PBH)" thought to have formed in the early universe. The paper claims that under certain conditions, PBHs can undergo a final emission (evaporation) so intense that they "burst" at the end of their lifespan, and that current telescopes can detect these signs.

What's "New": Dim Electromagnetic "Mimicry"

The key is "Dark QED (Toy Model)." It assumes interactions on the "dark side" similar to regular electromagnetism and heavy "dark electrons." If a PBH carries this "dark charge," it can survive in an extreme (quasi-extreme) state for a long time and finally release the charge, leading to a Schwarzschild-type final explosion—this depiction significantly raises the observability, changing the estimated explosion event from "once in 100,000 years" to "possibly occurring on a 10-year scale."Physical Review

What Signals Can We "See"?

The research team and reports explain that the final stage PBH heats up due to Hawking radiation, spewing particles like gamma rays in torrents, making detection possible through the collaboration of ground and space telescopes. The possibility of existing equipment (e.g., gamma-ray telescope arrays) being sufficient is indicated, sending the message to "prepare for observation."Popular Mechanics

Why Is There Now a "90%" Confidence?

This confident figure results from the alignment of "receiver readiness" with improved observational equipment and theoretical assumptions about the "number and charge distribution of PBHs." Of course, the probability is model-dependent, and it's important to note that the authors themselves caution that they are not saying it will absolutely happen within the next decade.dailygalaxy.com

"Disruptive" Impact on Cosmology and Particle Physics

1. Verification of PBH Existence

2. Direct Observation of Hawking Radiation

3. Comprehensive observation of emitted particles could provide clues to "unknown particles" beyond the Standard Model
   —these possibilities could advance simultaneously. The research group and various media express that it could "rewrite cosmic history" and "fundamentally change physics" due to this triple jump impact.ScienceDaily

Reactions from Social Media and Communities: A Clash of Enthusiasm and Caution

The news quickly became a hot topic in science communities on X and Reddit, but the tone is polarized.

• Excited Camp:
  There is eager anticipation, with comments like "If it can be captured with current equipment, we should strengthen the constant monitoring of the observation network" and "We might witness the moment of a 'cosmic firework.'" The media also supported the spread with clear headlines like "It might be visible within 10 years."Reddit

• Cautious/Critical Camp:
  On Reddit, the perennial debate "Can PBHs be dark matter?" has reignited. Comments highlight that "it's unlikely PBHs exist in large quantities" based on existing constraints like microlensing observations, and there are calm observations that the "explosion" is merely a brief flash at the final moment of Hawking evaporation. In other words, skepticism continues on two fronts: **quantity (how many are there?) and visibility (how do they shine?)**.Reddit

• Headline Skeptics:
  There are also media literacy reactions like "Don't be swayed by sensational headlines. Details depend on the model." This perspective is a regular in discussions about novel black hole topics.Reddit

Overall, while the progress of "entering the observational range" is welcomed, there is a prevailing atmosphere of scrutinizing the effectiveness of model assumptions and detection strategies.

What Needs to Be Done to "Not Miss" It: Observational To-Do

• Alert Collaboration: Automatic cross-referencing of wide-field gamma-ray/high-energy observations (satellite and ground) with optical transient surveys.

• Distinguishing Background Events: Criteria for distinguishing from short GRBs and flares originating from magnetic reconnection (spectral hardness, time structure, multi-wavelength simultaneity).

• Simultaneous Observation of Particle Messengers: Reinforcing the uniqueness of events with simultaneous triggers of neutrinos and cosmic rays.

• Pre-Simulation: Preparing synthetic templates of light curves/spectra of PBH explosions including "dark charge" and implementing them in fast filters of machine learning.

(Many of the above align with the position of the research team and explanatory articles that "current equipment is sufficient," but the rigor of preventing false detections is crucial on the ground.)Popular Mechanics

Is the "Exploding Black Hole" a Metaphor or Reality?

Essentially, it's a story of **"the final moment of evaporation appearing as an apparent explosion,"** and it cannot be equated with stellar explosions like supernovae. Still, just the direct detection of Hawking radiation could become a milestone in physics. Science always advances through the cycle of bold hypotheses and rigorous verification. The 90% this time is a strong pitch thrown from the hypothesis side. How multilayered a verification network can the observational side, the receiver, establish? The next decade will not be a quiet "wait" but a meticulous "attack" time.Physical Review

Powered by Froala Editor