Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

Is a Mysterious Current in the Barents Sea Melting Arctic Ice? The Invisible Pipeline Creating "Holes" in the Arctic Sea Ice — A 40-Year Halving of the Return Flow

Is a Mysterious Current in the Barents Sea Melting Arctic Ice? The Invisible Pipeline Creating "Holes" in the Arctic Sea Ice — A 40-Year Halving of the Return Flow

2025年06月24日 01:15

Introduction: "Invisible Circulation" Melts Ice

The Barents Sea, the gateway to the Arctic Ocean. The "return flow" quietly circulating near the seabed influences the disappearance of winter sea ice. The latest simulation from the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) reveals a new mechanism: the amount of warm Atlantic water that immediately returns determines the ice volume.phys.orgnature.com.



1. Background of the Study

Since the late 1970s, Arctic winter ice has become thinner and smaller each year. In the Barents Sea, "ice-free pockets" have rapidly increased even during winter.tc.copernicus.org. Traditionally, attention was focused only on the "inflow of warm Atlantic water," but the return flow that turns south midway was difficult to observe and remained a "black box."


2. Weakening of the Return Flow Captured by the Model

The AWI team recreated the years 1979–2019 using the FESOM2 sea ice-ocean coupled model (horizontal 1/10° mesh). As a result, the return flow halved over 40 years, allowing warm water to reach the ice edge, systematically reducing winter ice area.phys.orgawi.de.


3. Physical Mechanism

  • Weak return flow → Warm water stays longer in the Barents Sea → Heats from beneath the sea ice → Inhibits ice formation

  • Strong return flow → Immediately sends warm water back to the Norwegian Sea → Cools the Barents Sea, making it easier for ice to form

This "tipping point" is controlled by the wind patterns of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and the local low pressure over Spitsbergen.phys.org.


4. Impact on Society and Climate

  • European Winter Pressure Patterns: In years with weak return flow, increased heat release from the Arctic Ocean may lead to extreme warming and heavy rain in Europe.

  • Shipping and Energy: The disappearance of ice in winter could extend the navigation season for Russian LNG ships.

  • Ecosystems: Atlantic plankton flow in with warm water, accelerating an ecological shift known as "Atlantification."en.wikipedia.org.


5. Reactions on Social Media

PlatformSummary of Reactions (Excerpt)Source
X (formerly Twitter)/ NASA Earth"The rainbow swirls are signs of ocean currents. The ocean is an engine that transports Earth's heat."twitter.com
Climate Researcher Paul Beckwith"The efficiency decline of the Barents Sea 'cooling device' affects the AMOC."twitter.com
Norwegian Nansen Legacy"'Still Arctic?'—A paper urging reconsideration of whether the Barents Sea is truly Arctic."twitter.com
General User"Is it true that when Arctic ice melts, our utility bills go up?"—Posts linking global warming to living costs are increasing.(Summary from search results)

In the climate community, "how to measure the return flow, which is hydrologically difficult to observe, in the field" is a hot topic, and voices calling for the expansion of mooring observation networks are prominent on physics-related Mastodon.


6. Expert Comments

  • Dr. Finn Ole Heukamp (Lead Author)

    "The return flow is not 'noise' but a direct driver of ice volume."os.copernicus.org

  • Claudia Wekerle (Co-author)

    "The cause of errors on the scale of hundreds of thousands of square kilometers in future predictions was actually this unobserved component."


7. Gap Between Observations and Models

Direct observations of the return flow are less than 1%. AWI plans to install ADCP moorings off Svalbard in the summer of 2026. The European Space Agency's (ESA) new satellite CRISTAL (launch in 2027) is also expected to support indirect estimation with high-precision observations of sea ice thickness and surface roughness.


8. Policy Implications

  • Investment in Arctic Observation Networks—Strengthening observations of the return flow has a cost-benefit estimate (tens of millions of euros) against financing.

  • IMO Navigation Guidelines—Incorporating the return flow index into winter route ice condition forecasts allows for the revision of safe navigation models.

  • Improvement of Climate Models—In CMIP7, high-resolution ocean grids of 1/12° class are planned to be adopted, and this study provides scientific backing for that.


9. Future Research Topics

  1. Field Observations of Local Winds Driving the Return Flow

  2. Separation of Long-term Trends and Internal Variability

  3. Integrated Impact Assessment on Ecosystems and Fishery Resources

Related Articles

An understudied current in the Barents Sea may play a crucial role in the reduction of Arctic winter ice
Source: https://phys.org/news/2025-06-understudied-current-barents-sea-play.html

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.