Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

Controlling Children's Tantrums with a Smartwatch!? How the Latest Technology is Transforming Parenting

Controlling Children's Tantrums with a Smartwatch!? How the Latest Technology is Transforming Parenting

2026年01月17日 16:15

"If I had known it was coming..." The Struggle with Tantrums Lies in the "Disrupted Daily Life" Rather Than the "Duration"

A child's tantrum can instantly disrupt the family's schedule. Fatigue accumulates in the evening. Stimuli build up while out. Planned chores and care for siblings come to a halt, and parents continue to play the role of "firefighter."


Especially for children with traits like ADHD, emotional waves can rise suddenly, leaving both the child and those around them in a state of "not knowing how to stop." The focus this time is on the idea of shortening those "hard-to-stop tantrums" before they reach their peak.


What Smartwatches Offer is Not "Automation of Childcare" but "Providing Signals"

The center of attention is a system that links a smartwatch worn by the child with the parent's smartphone, estimating signs of rising stress from changes in heart rate and activity, and sending alerts to the parent.


What's important here is that the alert does not provide a "diagnosis" or the "correct way to discipline." It brings forward the timing for parents to "remember and execute interventions" they have learned (such as speaking calmly, reducing environmental stimuli, maintaining distance, and offering preemptive choices). In other words, it is a notification to activate the parent's skills.


Research Framework: A Trial Adding AI Alerts to PCIT for 50 Children Aged 3-7

The trial introduced in the report was a randomized controlled trial involving 50 children aged 3-7. All participants had externalizing problems (such as defiance, aggression, and intense emotional outbursts) and received **standard Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT)**. The group with the addition of smartwatch intervention with AI alerts (PCIT-AI) was compared to the standard therapy group (PCIT-TAU).


The first practical concern is whether it is "usable." If children dislike and remove the watch, it won't work. However, the median watch adherence reached approximately 75.7%, meeting the feasibility criteria set by the study.
Furthermore, the median time it took for parents to start responding after an alert was
3.65 seconds
, which feels like an "almost immediate reaction."


The core outcome was the duration of tantrums. In the PCIT-AI group, the average duration of tantrums was 10.4 minutes, compared to 22.1 minutes in the standard therapy group, showing a significant reduction. The simple expression of the reduction is "about 11 minutes."
Additionally, there was a reported difference in the occurrence of tantrums lasting more than 15 minutes.


Why Family Episodes Resonate: From "Fear of Evenings" to "Getting Nights Back"

The report introduces a case where a child was prone to tantrums as the effect of medication wore off in the evening. A family's voice was also shared, stating that what used to take an hour to calm down was reduced to 5-10 minutes with early intervention.


Such stories can easily be seen as boasting about a "magical tool." But the essence lies in the fact that what parents seek is not "zero tantrums," but keeping tantrums to a level where the household doesn't fall apart.


Nights return. Families gather at the dinner table. Siblings' time is not taken away. Fatigue that affects the next day is reduced. — What was shortened was not just "11 minutes," but the loss of daily life itself.


Why SNS Reactions Are Mixed: The Simultaneous Emergence of Hope and Rejection

This topic always divides opinions on social media. In fact, reactions were broadly divided into three categories.


1) "It's Scary at First, But Helpful" Group
On Reddit, comments like "It sounds dystopian at first, but if it can comfort before a tantrum starts, it's a good thing" were prominent. In other words, while feeling the "creepiness of surveillance," there is a compromise of wanting to accept it if the purpose is care.
On LinkedIn, there were voices appreciating the evolution of wearables from "recording" to "signals prompting behavioral change," emphasizing the value of second-by-second interventions for families.


2) "It's Still Surveillance" Group
Even within the same Reddit thread, there was a strong sense of rejection with comments like "it's dystopian no matter how you look at it." The structure of constantly tracking a child's physical responses and having the parent's smartphone sound an "alarm" inevitably evokes metaphors of a surveillance society.
The anxiety here is closer to an intuitive resistance to children's inner selves becoming "subjects managed by numbers" rather than guilt over "making things easier for parents."


3) "The Context of Neurodiversity Changes the Conversation" Group
Interestingly, as the discussion progressed, there was a trend of shared understanding that "the subject is not just a 'typical fussiness,'" leading to nuanced evaluations.

On Reddit, comments like "it's complicated when neurodiversity is involved" emerged, leading some to lean towards the understanding that "if a family needs support, they should use available tools."


In other words, the divide in opinions is not just about views on technology but also significantly influenced by "whose and what kind of issues" are being considered.


The Real Issue is Not "Accuracy" But "Operation" and "Data"

Technologies like these tend to draw attention to accuracy. However, at the implementation stage, the following issues weigh more heavily.

  • Privacy: Heart rate and sleep are extremely personal information, and children's data requires even more careful handling. The design of where it is stored, third-party provision, and future use (commercialization) is questioned.

  • Labeling: Whether the tag "this child has tantrums" will take on a life of its own outside the home (school, support institutions, surroundings).

  • Dependence: If there is no notification, no response is made, and if notifications are used for "quick fixes" every time they sound, the operation could become counterproductive.

  • Graduation Design: Whether there is a path prepared for the "training wheels to come off" in the future, with the assumption not being continuous wear but rather the establishment of parental intervention skills and the child learning self-regulation.


Conclusion: A Few Seconds' Advance Notice Can Save a Family's Night

The report and research this time are not about "machines replacing childcare." Rather, it is an attempt to enable parents to deliver the support they have already learned at the "most effective timing."


On the other hand, since it involves handling children's physical data, issues of surveillance and data distribution must always be considered together.
The benefit of "noticing a few seconds earlier" and the cost of "being constantly measured." As technology becomes more integrated into the field, the question of where families and society draw this balance becomes unavoidable.



Reference URLs (Consolidated Here/What Each Reference Points To)

  • JAMA Network Open (Original Paper): Primary Information on Trial Design, Key Figures (50 participants, 75.7% adherence, 3.65-second response, 10.4 minutes vs. 22.1 minutes, etc.)
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2842819

  • Reddit (r/singularity Thread): Range of Reactions (Comments on "Dystopia," "Acceptable if Supportive," "Complex with Neurodiversity," etc.)
    https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1pndbl4/smartwatch_system_helps_parents_shorten_and/

  • LinkedIn (Mayo Clinic Official Post): Overview of Research and Example Comments Evaluating Wearables as "Signals for Behavioral Change"
    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mayo-clinic_mayo-clinic-researchers-have-developed-a-activity-7406437984155316224-f0Yl 


Reference Article

Can Smartwatches Stop Tantrums on the Spot? Experts Seek the Answer.
Source: https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/health-and-families/smartwatch-kids-parents-tantrum-adhd-b2901221.html

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.