Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

German Public Opinion Divided: 54% Support "Ban on Social Media for Under-16s"—Could Australia's "Precedent" Be a Hint for Japan?

German Public Opinion Divided: 54% Support "Ban on Social Media for Under-16s"—Could Australia's "Precedent" Be a Hint for Japan?

2025年08月20日 00:52
In Germany, a Forsa public opinion poll was conducted to gauge support for banning social media use (such as TikTok and Instagram) for children and young people under the age of 16. The results showed 54% in favor, 41% against, and 5% undecided. Notably, support was 60% among households with parents and those aged 60 and over, and even among the 18-29 age group, 51% were in favor, indicating a majority even among younger demographics. The survey was conducted via telephone on August 14-15, targeting 1,001 people, with a margin of error of ±3 percentage points. This comes in the context of Australia implementing a new system starting December 2025, which will prohibit account ownership for those under 16 and impose fines of up to A$49.5 million on violating platforms. In Germany, however, constitutional issues are raised regarding simple age-based regulations due to fundamental rights and parental authority. Reactions on social media are divided between health and education professionals who argue it is necessary for protection, and tech journalists and libertarian critics who worry it could lead to constant surveillance and excessive state intervention. Key factors for implementation include technology for age verification, privacy considerations, enhanced digital education in schools, and parental support.
← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.