The government is making a serious effort to eliminate lines at women's restrooms by reviewing the installation standards to correct the disparity.

The government is making a serious effort to eliminate lines at women's restrooms by reviewing the installation standards to correct the disparity.

Introduction: Why Are There Always Lines for Women's Restrooms?

  • The frequent occurrence of "lines for women's restrooms" in public spaces in Japan.

  • Physiological time differences between genders (makeup touch-ups, menstrual needs, accompanying children, etc.).

  • Structural issues where the presence of men's urinals leads to differences in usage efficiency even with the same area.

Chapter 1: Limitations of the Current System

  • The concept of installation numbers based on the Building Standards Act (floor area, number of users).

  • Current standards are based on "gender equality" figures that do not match reality.

  • The increase of multi-purpose toilets has been a response, but not a fundamental solution.

Chapter 2: Japan's Lag in International Comparison

  • Many states in the U.S. have "toilet parity" laws.

  • In South Korea and Taiwan, the ratio of women's restrooms has increased as part of tourism policies.

  • Unisex toilets are also being introduced in Europe.

  • Japan is lagging due to cultural resistance.

Chapter 3: New Government Initiatives

  • Proposal of installation ratio by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (e.g., 2:1).

  • Priority introduction at large event venues and inside stations.

  • Demonstration experiments in collaboration with local governments.

  • Cooperation with the Japan Tourism Agency and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to improve convenience for foreign visitors and families with children.

Chapter 4: Social Impact

  • "Equalization of time" by eliminating lines.

  • Reduction of barriers that hinder women's social participation.

  • Improvement of gender equality awareness and international evaluation.

  • Applicable to toilet issues in evacuation centers during disasters.

Chapter 5: Challenges and Concerns

  • The issue of increased construction costs.

  • Cases where renovation is difficult due to building structure.

  • Pros and cons of introducing unisex toilets.

  • Balancing with barrier-free measures in an aging society.

Chapter 6: Voices of the Public and Private Initiatives

  • Dissatisfaction with "toilet disparity" on social media.

  • Examples of independent improvements in commercial facilities (women's priority floors, powder room lounges, etc.).

  • Demonstration experiments by private companies on "time-saving toilets" and "app-linked toilets."

Conclusion: Toilets as Social Infrastructure

Related Articles