Skip to main content
ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア Logo
  • All Articles
  • 🗒️ Register
  • 🔑 Login
    • 日本語
    • 中文
    • Español
    • Français
    • 한국어
    • Deutsch
    • ภาษาไทย
    • हिंदी
Cookie Usage

We use cookies to improve our services and optimize user experience. Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy for more information.

Cookie Settings

You can configure detailed settings for cookie usage.

Essential Cookies

Cookies necessary for basic site functionality. These cannot be disabled.

Analytics Cookies

Cookies used to analyze site usage and improve our services.

Marketing Cookies

Cookies used to display personalized advertisements.

Functional Cookies

Cookies that provide functionality such as user settings and language selection.

OpenAI Defeats Elon Musk's Grok! AI Summit Showdown on Kaggle: OpenAI o3 Triumphs, Why Did Grok4 Fall Apart?

OpenAI Defeats Elon Musk's Grok! AI Summit Showdown on Kaggle: OpenAI o3 Triumphs, Why Did Grok4 Fall Apart?

2025年08月09日 12:05

1) The Chess Showdown "Musk vs Altman": Venue and Schedule

Reflecting the power dynamics of AI companies, Elon Musk's xAI and Sam Altman's OpenAI are set to face off in a chess match. The event is hosted by Google's new platform, Kaggle Game Arena. The tournament took place from August 5–7 (U.S. time, JST: 6–8) in a single-elimination format featuring LLMs. Participants included OpenAI (o3, o4-mini), xAI (Grok 4), Google (Gemini 2.5 Pro / Flash), Anthropic (Claude 4 Opus), DeepSeek (R1), and Moonshot AI (Kimi k2), showcasing top current models.chessdom.comChess.com


2) Overall Results: o3's Complete Victory, Gemini Takes Third

On the first day, the four models o3/Grok4/Gemini 2.5 Pro/o4-mini advanced smoothly to the top four. In the semifinals, Grok4 narrowly defeated Gemini in a fierce battle that went to Armageddon, while o3 crushed o4-mini 4–0. In the final on the last day, o3 defeated Grok4 4–0, claiming the inaugural championship. In the third-place match, Gemini 2.5 Pro beat o4-mini 3.5–0.5 to win the bronze medal.The Times of Indiachessdom.comChess.com


3) What Determined the Outcome: Grok4's "Mysterious Sacrifices" and o3's Endgame Skills

Reviewing the final's game records, Grok4 frequently encountered major mishaps, such as unnecessary sacrifices (piece losses) in the opening and a major blunder where the queen mistakenly captured a protected pawn. In contrast, o3 managed to find tactical traps even in seemingly disadvantageous positions, overturning the situation and pressing on without giving the opponent any basic drawing chances in the endgame. Post-match reports highlighted the contrast between Grok4's pattern of "early fatal mistakes leading to irrecoverable positions" and o3's "recovery and precision after mishaps."Chess.com


4) Critical Comments from the Reigning Champion

The event featured commentary from Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura. Carlsen sarcastically remarked about Grok4's repeated mistakes in the final, saying it was like "watching a children's match," which drew laughter and murmurs from the audience. Nakamura focused on the seemingly understood but actually misunderstood sequences in the opening, middle, and endgame, pointing out the difficulty LLMs have in understanding endgames.The Indian Expresschessdom.com


5) How Social Media Reacted (Summary of Reactions)

 


  • Praise for the Winner: Chess-related accounts summarized the shock of the shutout, saying "o3 'steamrolled' Grok4."X (formerly Twitter)

  • Spread of Breaking News: Tech influencers quickly spread headlines like "OpenAI Defeats Grok."X (formerly Twitter)

  • Community Atmosphere: On Reddit's AI threads, comments like "o3 'obliterated'" and "OpenAI's LLM is a head above the rest in chess" were highly ranked. On the other hand, there were calm rebuttals like "Chess doesn't measure the overall intelligence of LLMs" and "Differences in data and exploration budget."Reddit

  • Musk's Side of the Story: During the tournament, there was buzz about "Grok's peak performance" claims and subsequent posts suggesting that "chess aptitude is merely a side effect." The discrepancy between competition results and public relations messages is understandable as a brand strategy, but the evaluation of technical validity is a separate matter.X (formerly Twitter)Yahoo! Finance


6) Is This a Ranking of "Overall AI Capability"?

Short Answer:No.
The outcome of this event merely demonstrated "the ability of LLMs to choose moves in perfect information games (games without hidden information, like chess or shogi)." Factors such as depth of exploration, bias in training data, methods of self-play and analysis, and time settings can easily change the rankings. In reality, the strength of specialized engines (like Stockfish) is on a different level, and the relative comparison among LLMs is more meaningful as a "test of inference consistency in language models." Kaggle Game Arena itself plans to expand beyond chess to include other games and settings, aiming to publish continuous benchmarks in the future.Kaggle


7) Strategic and Brand Implications

  • OpenAI: While o3 was seen as a "soon-to-be-retired model," its victory added prestige to its inference robustness. The key for the product side is how much they emphasize the "inheritance points from o3."OfficeChai

  • xAI: Grok4 appeared to be the strongest from the first day to the semifinals. However, the consecutive blunders in the final exposed stability issues. The next challenge is how to improve this (stabilizing exploration, retraining evaluation functions, enhancing thinking prompts, etc.).The Times of Indiachessdom.com

  • Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro secured third place. While there might be a perception that OpenAI's team is a step ahead in tuning LLM's "inference consistency × exploration," considering the close semifinals, there is ample room for narrowing the gap.


8) Technical Note: Why Do LLMs Struggle in the Endgame?

LLMs are text sequence generators and tend to struggle with strict minimax exploration and full utilization of openings and endgame tables. They approximate the compressed representations humans call "patterns" in language, and because temperature and probability are involved, positions with a single winning line become more unstable. The final match demonstrated this weakness in Grok4, while o3 managed to cover it with exception handling and resilience—a natural understanding.Chess.com



Appendix: Verification of Key Facts

  • Event: Kaggle Game Arena AI Chess Exhibition (8/5–7, local) / Final was o3 4–0 Grok4, third place went to Gemini 2.5 Pro.Chess.com+1

  • Semifinals: Grok4 3–2 Gemini (tiebreak) / o3 4–0 o4-mini.

  • Commentators: Magnus Carlsen / Hikaru Nakamura participated.chessdom.com+1

  • Social Media Spread: Chess media and tech influencers posted victory news.X (formerly Twitter)+1

Reference Article

OpenAI Defeats Elon Musk's Grok in AI Chess Tournament

← Back to Article List

Contact |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Cookie Settings

© Copyright ukiyo journal - 日本と世界をつなぐ新しいニュースメディア All rights reserved.